<HTML>In a message dated 10/21/2003 9:12:26 AM Pacific Daylight Time, siano@mail.med.upenn.edu writes: <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">I wouldn't even give them that much of a rationalization. I would urge people to start thinking of O'Reilly, Limbaugh, Savage and the rest as a bunch of _pussies_. Whiny, self-absorbed, privileged little pussies who just can't _stand_ the thought of people who disagree with them. Weak-kneed, selfish, terrified little girly-men who need whole _corporations_ to coddle them and tell them they're special. Fragile little crybabies who fold as soon as they're challenged by anyone. Only word for it, gang. Fucking _pussies_. Now, I understand that some people may feel uncomfortable with using the term "pussies," what with its other slang meanings, and all. Perfectly understandable. But I believe we should put aside this squeamishness in favor of the bigger, more important issue, which is to humiliate these creeps, to _hurt_ their _feelings_, and make them feel _really, really bad_. (In fact, it would hurt their feelings even more if _women_ called them pussies. So have them, ladies!) ___________________________________ http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk </BLOCKQUOTE> Ahem! I take GRAVE exception to anyone polluting the glorious powerful word PUSSY by putting O'Reilly, Limbaugh, Savage anywhere near them in a sentence. I wouldn't want the three of them anywhere near ANYTHING I value least of all that! Even a nice dom scene with the three of them cowering in worship is just TOO MUCH. And while I am at it, what is is about men who think the most demeaning thing they can say about other men is to equate them with women?????? DoreneC</HTML>