<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"> <BR>
From: Jon Johanning <BR>
<BR>
-clip-<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
I think this helps to explain something that always puzzles me when I <BR>
hear people making the claim that a lot of high-powered "social theory" <BR>
or "social science" is needed for effective radical political action: <BR>
the fact that there have been revolutions going back to ancient Greece, <BR>
ancient China, ancient nearly everywhere else. If a social science <BR>
that even its champions admit is still far from being in a mature stage <BR>
were necessary to pull off a successful revolution, how could it have <BR>
been possible so long ago?<BR>
<BR>
Clearly, it was possible because folks were just as smart about sizing <BR>
each other up and getting the lay of the social land then as they have <BR>
been ever since and are now. In other words, contrary to a common <BR>
conception, people have not just been wallowing around in the swamp of <BR>
religious/ideological darkness through all of its history up to -- pick <BR>
your Age of Enlightenment: 18th, 19th, 20th century? Yes, there is all <BR>
the "false consciousness" that is so maddeningly prevalent in our <BR>
species, but we can take care of business, too, when we put our minds <BR>
to it.<BR>
<BR>
^^^^^^^^<BR>
<BR>
CB: Without necessarily calling it a lot of highpowered stuff, I think one idea is that the next revolution will be better , based on learning from all the earlier ones down through history that you have mentioned. Just as in other sciences, we want a theory of history and revolution, of society , that develops based on our accumulation of experience with each other. "We" ( the human race) can do better and better at revolution , and after the insurrection in the ongoing new society, exactly because we learn from mistakes of past generations, etc. , a long term trial and error process, so to speak. One characteristic of the next rev. , the one to transform out of capitalism, the one to really take care of business, might be that it is more explicitly conscious of itself as a revolution to end all class exploitative society, and just in general that the masses of people who make it are more class and revolutionary conscious than previous generations , ancient generations, who made the revolutions and evolutions you refer to. <BR>
</FONT></HTML>