Is the greater fluidity of femal sexuality natural? I don't think so; it's just more accepted in this society. A girl can be a tomboy pretty much forever without any special meaning being attached to it. A guy has to stop doing "girlish" things at about six. That's got to be tough on the little guys. My poor son lived for his ballet class, then he found out "boys don't do that" and he quit immediately.
You say we have to categorize...I think so far that's our biggest disagreement. Haven't you ever noticed the extraordinary joy you feel when you are able to perceive the "newness" and uniqueness of someone? --- when precisely you can't put them in any box whatsoever?
As for Justin's remark and whether or not it was flattering and what that had to do with objectification and the Sex and the City stuff, I'm sorry, but I couldn't follow your argument. But I'm writing this, dripping with sweat, having just returned from my belly dance class. I've studied belly dance for fifteen years and I'm good enough to perform in public -- though I rarely do. Now when I do this type of dance, I'm perfectly aware of the fact that a lot of men and women react to it the way they react to a stripper or a lap dancer (with lascivious contempt); but not everyone reacts this way. When I dance, I can only imagine dancing for people who understand that this dance, while sexual/sensual and all that, is also beautiful and that I'm dancing it to bring out this beauty and to make them catch their breath...and be surprised by its beauty. Am I flattered by those who understand the dance and react in this way? No, I'm gratified and I feel that, yes, all this hard work has enabled me to give this gift.
Thanks for writing,
Joanna