> Fundamentalist xtian men alone cannot account for nearly half off the
> popular vote Bush received in 2000 and will likely to receive in 2004.
Yes, it does look very simplistic explanation.
> Otherwise, I have to say that agree with what Mr. Sachs said, which I
> find ironic, if not unsettling.
I am skeptical about the utility of his scenario for the year 2050 (Rise of China, India, other regions and the decline of the US). Need I say that I don't necessarily agree with everything I post? :-)
Ulhas