>. . . because he is NOT going to be on the ballot.
>
>He probably failed to meet the relatively easy threshold of getting 10,000
>signatures in MASSACHUSETTS! Nader's campaign said they collected 14,000
>signatures but the Secretary of State has only received 5,700 3 days after the
>deadline.
>
>http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2004/08/06/nader_effort_to_gain_mass_ballot_access_is_in_doubt/
>
>This goes to a huge problem. A lot of people like to pontificate about
>strategy,relevance, message, and policy -- how about just doing simple
>necessary work?
Clearly they didn't hire enough flat taxers and right-to-lifers to do the work!
Doug