[lbo-talk] The Importance of Disenfranchising Nader/Camejo Voters

mike larkin mike_larkin2001 at yahoo.com
Tue Aug 10 14:49:55 PDT 2004


Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> wrote: mike larkin wrote:


>Whatever it takes to keep Nader off the ballot in battleground
>states, I'm for it. I'll burn the signature cards myself.

Hey, that's not fair. U.S. ballot access restrictions suck - they were designed to impede democracy and grease elite rule. I don't like Ralph's candidacy, but it's his right to run. If it weren't so hard to get on the ballot, we wouldn't be facing this dismal choice.

Doug

You're right. It's not fair. But I'd still do it if someone asked me to.

--------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <../attachments/20040810/35386cb0/attachment.htm>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list