In the USA, the Constitution is the *supreme* law of the land. To say that judges are obliged to interpret the "law" but to take no account of the conflict between the supreme law and a state-or-federally enacted statute is to say that, as a matter of principle, they should violate their oath of office.
To say, as Miles Jackson does, that "If people in a community somewhere didn't want to live according to the U. S. Bill of Rights, should they be compelled to?" is to deny the humanity of those *people* whose legal rights are violated under laws enacted by a putative majority of the people in that community.
Shane Mage
"Thunderbolt steers all things...It consents and does not consent to be called Zeus."
Herakleitos of Ephesos