Relativism and Rorty (Was Re: [lbo-talk] Democracy and Constitutional Rights)

dave dorkin ddorkin1 at yahoo.com
Fri Aug 13 11:47:21 PDT 2004


I think those following this issue would be interested in this book which deals very closely with this question:

LIBERALS AND CANNIBALS by Steven Lukes

Steven Lukes’ important new book takes its title from an aphorism coined by the late Martin Hollis: “liberalism for the liberals; cannibalism for the cannibals”. According to Hollis, this ‘disastrous parallel’ is characteristically drawn by relativists, who hold the view that the liberal values of freedom and equality under the law are culturally embedded and do not apply across cultural boundaries or to ways of life different to ours.

Liberalism, in this picture, is just what “we” do, and its prescriptions don’t apply to “them.” To suppose that they do, the relativist argues, is to commit a kind of ethnocentric fallacy, and to fail to see that all cultures are valid in their own terms, bound by norms and principles applicable only to themselves.

This is a widespread and influential view. Lukes shares Hollis’s conviction that its influence in philosophy and social and political theory is baleful. He raises four main objections against it...

<http://www.newhumanist.org.uk/volume118issue3_more.php?id=85_0_21_0_C>

Dave

__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list