Etienne wrote:
>
>
> Aren't there two aspects to this which people are confusing? One is
> corporate personhood in the sense of corporations being treated as
> single entities capable of entering into legal relationships separate
> from the relationships of the shareholders, board, etc. The other is
> corporations being granted (some of) the civil rights of real people.
I haven't followed most posts on this thread, but I had wondered if anyone had checked on the status of corporations in other advanced capitalist nations, where there is no 14th amendment and no Supreme Court on the u.s. model.
Carrol