B
Michael Dawson wrote:
> Great Tuchman story, but, as usual, Franken's
conclusion is dead wrong.
> Arguing about tax breaks for the rich is indeed
class warfare.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org
[mailto:lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org]
> > On Behalf Of snit snat
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 3:55 AM
> > To: Lame Brained Onanists
> > Subject: [lbo-talk] class warfare
> >
> > on another list, someone's been using a line from
Al Franken for her sig:
> >
> >
> > "In her book *A Distant Mirror: The Calamitous
Fourteenth Century*,
> > Barbara
> > Tuchman writes about a peasant revolt in 1358 that
began in the village of
> > St. Leu and spread throughout the Oise valley. At
one estate, the serfs
> > sacked the manor house, killed the knight, and
> > roasted him on a spit in front of his wife and
kids. Then, after ten or
> > twelve peasants violated the lady, with the
children still watching, they
> > forced her to eat the roasted flesh of her husband
and then killed her.
> >
> > *That* is class warfare.
> >
> > Arguing over the optimum marginal tax rate for the
top one percent is
> > not."
===== "I'm not too worried by hegemony / I know the cadre will look after me" - Magazine, "Model Worker," 1978