[lbo-talk] The Occupation, was [Fwd: Fw: Why the torture atAbu Ghraib...

[Robert D. Day]

I can't stop smiling at the irony of this. The imperative for Carroll 
to perform what I can only assume must be an anatomical impossibility 
came from none other than the moderator himself, Doug Henwood.

Henwood needs to find some way to indicate that his remarks are in some 
kind of jest -- if they are -- or keep them off-list, if they're 
serious. (Emoticons, anyone?)  If subscribers wanted one-line 
quasi-comebacks like this, we would go to USENET.

--- Robert

==========

On Dec 19, 2004, at 8:44 PM, Louis Kontos wrote:

Carrol's position seems logical and moral to me. I could be missing 
something, but don't see what could justify the vitriolic response to 
his remarks. I don't know who wrote 'go fuck yourself, Carrol', at the 
bottom, but I would call on the moderator to keep the forum civil. As 
for Michael Dawson: I have read many of your posts and have generally 
found little of worth in them coupled with an infantile tendency to 
attack people with whom you disagree. Not good.
Louis Kontos