> By [accepting the] assertion [that if its
> created by the labor of its owner, property
> is not theft] Einstein and his heirs should
> own the stream/flow of exchange value of
> the STR, the GTR and lots of other 'stuff.'
> And why *shouldn't* he? What makes his
> creativity different from that of Little Richard,
> or Picasso?
^^^^
Well, isn't one (obvious) element that makes it "different" what the copyright act as long interpreted/applied by the courts in this connection makes the law?