[lbo-talk] plagiarism watch

Michael Dawson MDawson at pdx.edu
Thu Dec 23 09:36:17 PST 2004


So you'd throw out the baby with the bathwater? Why? Of course, it's only human decency that people who can't perform normal labor, which is a blessing, should be given a comfortable and socially meaningful existence. But I never claimed the labor theory of value and property explains everything. It just explains the relationship between work and justice. You know, just a little, small topic like that...

If you dump the LTOV, where's the injustice in capitalist industry? Recall that Marx claimed his discovery of the difference between labor and labor-power was the bedrock of Das Kapital. A good Marxist like you surely knows that fact.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org [mailto:lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org]
> On Behalf Of Yoshie Furuhashi
> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 10:27 PM
> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org; furuhashi.1 at osu.edu
> Subject: [lbo-talk] plagiarism watch
>
> Michael Dawson mdawson at pdx.edu, Wed Dec 22 21:28:19 PST 2004:
> >What claim, then, do "ordinary" workers have to wages and a
> >proportionate say over surpluses?
>
> If the labor theory of property were the basis of individuals' claim
> to products of social labor, the disabled, the unemployed, those who
> are too young or too old to work, housewives and househusbands, etc.
> would have little to no claim to them. A socialist movement needs a
> better foundation than that.
> --
> Yoshie
>
> * Critical Montages: <http://montages.blogspot.com/>
> * "Proud of Britain": <http://www.proudofbritain.net/ > and
> <http://www.proud-of-britain.org.uk/>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list