[lbo-talk] New Imperialism or New Capitalism?

Jonathan Nitzan nitzan at yorku.ca
Tue Dec 28 13:04:48 PST 2004


Sure, Marx saw capital accumulation as a transformation from money to commodities to more money. But the underlying unit in which this transformation was measured was abstract labor, a unit that no one has ever seen and that is logically impossible. Although Marx understood the process of financial capitalization better than most, he also believed that, in the final analysis, this process oscillated around the path charted by the the production of surplus value. This is where we get the notion that finance can get "delinked" from production -- but then how can you get delinked from a quantum you do not and cannot know?

Charles Brown wrote:


> What about the fact that in Vol. II of _Capital_, Marx characterizes
> capitalist accumulation as accumulation of money,i.e. finances, not
> capital - M-C-M', not C-M-C' ? Not ownership of variable and
> constant capital in the form of control of material activity in the
> form of labor power expressed or means of production, but of filthy
> lucre ?
>
>
> CB
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list