[lbo-talk] Kerry vs. Bush: no contest?
Joseph Wanzala
jwanzala at hotmail.com
Wed Feb 4 17:05:30 PST 2004
I wonder to what extent the ascendance of Kerry and the demise of Dean
change the calculus of people who have urged Nader not to run? Even I was
finding myself trying to rationalize supporting Dean's campaign and I even
feel a little sad that he is out of the running. I felt really bad for him
when he sputtered through Al Sharpton's scurrilous attacks on him for not
hiring blacks last December (which I thought was weird, but now I know why
http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0405/barrett.php)
Anyway, what I am wondering is: does a Kerry candidacy change the rationale
for not wanting Nader to run? I'm sure for most the answer is of course not,
but I suspect that much of the anti-Nader sentiment was based on the
palatableness of Dean.....?
>From: "Michael Dawson -PSU" <mdawson at pdx.edu>
>Reply-To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>To: <lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org>
>Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Kerry: America First!
>Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 16:27:18 -0800
>
>Kerry is a complete dong.
>
>Run, Ralph, run!
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
_________________________________________________________________
Get a FREE online virus check for your PC here, from McAfee.
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
More information about the lbo-talk
mailing list