Perhaps, Pilger has a different understanding of what "winning" means than mine. In my view, resistance fighters themselves cannot win as long as they have no political wing that can command allegiance of sizable sectors of all critical constituencies in Iraq. War is the continuation of politics by other means -- to put it differently, what is primary is political struggle, not armed struggle.
Right now, resistance fighters have no political wing at all, as far as I can see -- most likely, there are many autonomous cells with different political tendencies engaged in armed struggle with no common political program to unite them. If the occupation continues for long and the ranks of resistance fighters grow, however, they may eventually develop a political wing, whose program it is impossible to foresee at this moment. -- Yoshie
* Bring Them Home Now! <http://www.bringthemhomenow.org/> * Calendars of Events in Columbus: <http://www.osu.edu/students/sif/calendar.html>, <http://www.freepress.org/calendar.php>, & <http://www.cpanews.org/> * Student International Forum: <http://www.osu.edu/students/sif/> * Committee for Justice in Palestine: <http://www.osudivest.org/> * Al-Awda-Ohio: <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Al-Awda-Ohio> * Solidarity: <http://www.solidarity-us.org/>