[lbo-talk] RIP, Dr. Fraud

RE earnest at tallynet.com
Thu Feb 19 11:34:38 PST 2004


It was with a heavy, heavy heart that I clicked on the link. But hey, this guy's no Grunbaum!

"Another way to put it is that it is psychoanalysis itself that has infected the Western soul with penis envy, Oedipal conflicts, death drives and so on. For these ideas are not given to, and cannot be found in, the world."

and

"Next year let's honor the centenary of Freud's famously unfunny 1905 book, "Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious."

Looks like he feels that appealing to everyone's yearning for streamlined rationality and jokes that are just a teeny bit multivocal and won't get anyone in trouble is enough to sink psychoanalysis, and so up on the soap box he goes. But this idiotic level of criticism is downright encouraging to cultists like myself. Randy

----- Original Message ----- From: "Carl Remick" <carlremick at hotmail.com> To: <lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 9:39 AM Subject: [lbo-talk] RIP, Dr. Fraud

Psychoanalysis Is Dead ... So How Does That Make You Feel?

Arguably no other notable figure in history was as wrong as Freud was about every important thing he had to say.

By Todd Dufresne

February 18, 2004

What an utter disappointment the 1990s were for the fans of Freud. Time magazine asked aloud, and on its cover no less, "Is Freud Dead?" And the former analytic stronghold, the New York Review of Books, published lengthy feature articles debunking Freud's reputation as a man and as a thinker.

By the end of the decade, even the New Yorker was in on the action. Taken as a whole, these sensations of the 1990s, part of the so-called "Freud wars," capture the gist of a cause well lost.

The year 2000 - the centenary of "The Interpretation of Dreams" - should have been a triumph for Freudians. Instead, amid the celebrations was a funereal whiff of defeat: The psychoanalytic century was over before the 21st century had begun. Everyone knew the answer to Time's rhetorical question. Psychoanalysis was indeed dead.

Well, almost everyone knew. You can always count on intellectuals to keep a candle burning for whatever idea they've invested long years, enormous sums of money and, perhaps above all, limitless ego promoting.

Obviously, it's not easy to walk away from a venture of this magnitude - one that helped pave the way for tenure and the prestige of authorship. Over the years, there were so many books, so many reviews, so many lectures, all with so little perspective on Freud's limitations, and partisans were just not ready to give it all up. So the Freud industry soldiered on.

Freud is truly in a class of his own. Arguably no other notable figure in history was so fantastically wrong about nearly every important thing he had to say. ...

<http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-dufresne18feb18,1,5672 071.story?coll=la-news-comment-opinions>

Carl

_________________________________________________________________ Watch high-quality video with fast playback at MSN Video. Free! http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200365ave/direct/01/

___________________________________ http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list