[lbo-talk] Rwandan massacres not racist?

Gary? sladeg at verizon.net
Sat Feb 21 09:58:06 PST 2004


From: "Grant Lee"
> There have been comments in a couple of threads recently to the effect
that
> the Rwandan mass killings was not "racist". I don't really understand how
> such statements can be justified. The only reason I can perceive for such
> comments would be that both the Tutsis and Hutus were black Africans. But
> racism _rarely_ relies on something as overt as difference in skin colour.
> They were and are different ethnic groups and that is all it takes for
> racist ideology and for violence to occur. Perhaps I'm missing something?
>
exactly , 800,000 people died in Rwanda whilst the US played with the semantics of 'acts of genocide' as opposed to Genocide which is supposed to activate immediate action, so holding up intervention. A double dose of racism.

Gary? ride si sapis



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list