> Yeah, I can see the point that the mildly troubling
> think about Clark is not taht he is identified with
> the antiwar movement, but with a controversial
> ("Saddam-loving") wing of it, thus making himself and
> the rest ofa target for more smears. I also agree
> that people here vastly overestimate the attention
> that ordinary people even of moderate political
> awareness pays to who's who and who stands for what
> (actually or otherwise) in the movement.
Are "anti-imperialism" and "anti-war movement" the only possible bases for a viable Left politics in the US?
Ulhas