[lbo-talk] Re: IAC/ANSWER hack to defend saddam?/Re: Clark/SH

Stephen Philion philion at hawaii.edu
Mon Jan 5 14:11:01 PST 2004


Michael wrote: "Confessions of an Anti-Sanctions Activist, " by Charles M. Brown, in their simple-minded earnestness, and the IAC anti-sanctions activists, in their cynicism, totally leave out of the picture in their agit-prop any confrontion w/ the facts of massive corruption by the Baathist elite and the 67 Palaces of SH.

--This argument I always found unconvincing. yes, corruption, cronyism, etc. characterised the Saddam reign. the 67 palaces however could never have been built and the same impact on Iraq would have been felt as concerned sanctions. when ya can't even import lead pencils, medicines, etc....you can be as saintly as you believe necessary in running a country and you're gonna be in trouble, big trouble. and Brown's argument really misses the key point which Dillip Hiro provides a fine counterargument to in his book on Iraq, namely that the sanctions were imposed for the purpose of regime change, not regime reform, which Clinton and Bush both were open about. Talk about temerity and imperial reach.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list