[lbo-talk] Re: Lbo-talk digest, (psychology, economics)

Daniel Davies d_squared_2002 at yahoo.co.uk
Sun Jan 11 23:38:16 PST 2004



>
>
> Jon Johanning wrote:
> >
> > but I suspect
> > genetics also has something to do with it. Probably there hasn't been
> > any research on this as yet, given the great difficulty so far of
> > linking up genetics with psycholog.
> >

The great difficulty so far in linking up genetics with psychology is going to last *forever* because there aren't enough genes. Really. This is settled science now; there are only about 30,000 genes in the human sequence. That means it is, always and forever, going to be impossible to find one-for-one links between psychological traits and DNA-RNA sequences. One might argue that psychological traits are coded in "gene complexes", but the simple combinatorics of the matter suggest that claim is always going to be a matter of faith rather than anything which could realistically be proven.


>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:55:10 -0500
> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
> From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com>
> Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Whither AEA?
> Reply-To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>
> Is academic economics, at least as practiced in the U.S., of much
> relevance or interest to anyone outside the profession?
>
> Doug
>

For small values of "interest", yeh. There is the odd interesting thing that gets done. I remember one once.

dd

=====

________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list