> People get turned off by Friedman's snide elitist rhetoric, but in
> substance, his position is actually pretty strongly pro-Palestinian, at
> least within the context of US politics.
What would be more pro-Palestinian? Defending (or merely issuing apologia for) continued suicide bombing? Demanding a one-state solution or insisting on a two-state solution with the ROR, even though most Palestinians are willing to give up the ROR in return for a state?
-- Luke