>votes for Nader/Camejo, whether the ticket wins or loses, registers
>American dissent from the bipartisan consensus for wars,
>occupations, and empire
Loses is as certain as tomorrow's sunrise. Regardless of that, isn't it a bit risky to view the Nader/Camejo vote as a referendum on "wars, occupations, and empire"? Those unpleasant things are likely to get a 97% endorsement from the U.S. electorate, since you find it impossible to believe that anyone who votes for Kerry is against wars, occupations, and emipre.
Doug