> The only problem is that I didn't say that Bush being re-elected would
> be "better" in any sense.
You did say that the reelection of Bush would bring on the revolution faster. Isn't that better? Or is the revolution like the female orgasm which someone referred to a few days ago -- the slower it comes the more spectacular it is?
(BTW, the question of why that doesn't apply to male orgasms never received an answer, I believe. Well, one would have to check in Masters and Johnson to be sure, but I think that it is largely a difference between the M/F sexual mechanisms. Though it is true that delaying the orgasm (which men, unlike most women, have to learn how to do, and which does not necessarily happen easily) does increase the pleasure somewhat, for men as well.)
Jon Johanning // jjohanning at igc.org __________________________________ When I was a little boy, I had but a little wit, 'Tis a long time ago, and I have no more yet; Nor ever ever shall, until that I die, For the longer I live the more fool am I. -- Wit and Mirth, an Antidote against Melancholy (1684)