> Using it to express simple
> hostility to female low-wage workers and their bodies just isn't good
> enough.
>
no, this is a common working class broad stroke that encompasses both
male and female, the disembodied voice was that of a male. I have no
hostility toward low wage female workers , I am myself a stupid twat
sometimes. One of the problems with you intellectuals is this
preoccupation with dissecting every fucking sentence and giving greater
import to a word than necessary. We end up with offense where there is
none and a waste of emotion, in Europe swearing rarely has gender, I can
call a woman a stupid prick and a man a stupid twat, it would rarely be
taken in offense, the context hold the power not the word. You can hold
your body labels sacred and take umbrage with casual usage. You can
chastise me for shooting the messenger instead of the corporate ad
people who produced this aural invasion or we can just ignore a flippant
remark or we can wonder at a people who spend billions on pornography
but shun nudity.
Gary? ride si sapis