[lbo-talk] Lurch gone to Choate

Doug Henwood dhenwood at panix.com
Wed Jun 2 15:52:34 PDT 2004


[via Sam Smith's Progressive Review <http:/prorev.com>]

HOWELL RAINES ON JOHN KERRY

http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,3604,1229285,00.html

[Raines is now writing for the British Guardian]

HOWELL RAINES, GUARDIAN – I believe Kerry can do it, but I feel less sure of that now than I did in the primaries. Every time I talk to a reporter who has covered him, new doubts creep in about his ability to connect with voters. I personally find him easier to talk to than Al Gore, but there's no denying that he's ponderous.

And he's pompous in a way that Gore is not. With Gore, you feel that if he could choose, he would have been born poor and cool. Kerry radiates the feeling that he is entitled to his sense of entitlement. Probably that comes from spending too much time with Teddy Kennedy, but it's a problem. The TV camera is an x-ray for picking up attitudinal truths, and Kerry's lantern jaw and Addams Family face somehow reinforce the message that this guy has passed from ponderous to pompous and is so accustomed to privilege that he doesn't have to worry about looking goofy. It's as if Lurch had gone to Choate.

Recently, a lot of campaign reporters were writing that Kerry is altering his "populist" message and moving to the centre. If John Kerry was ever a populist, George W Bush is a Rhodes scholar. Here's what Kerry has to face up to and build upon. The difference between him and Bush is that Kerry represents the liberal, charitable wing of the Privilege party and George W represents the conservative, greedy wing of the Privilege party.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list