for them as might be curious, see: http://www.newyorkmetro.com/nymetro/news/features/n_8503/ and http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/?030203ta_talk_remnick
j
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Luke Weiger" <lweiger at umich.edu>
> Date: Thu Jun 10, 2004 4:25:28 PM America/Chicago
> To: <lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org>
> Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Hersh talk at U of C
> Reply-To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>
> David Remnick supported the war.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeffrey Fisher" <jfisher at igc.org>
> To: <lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org>
> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 4:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Hersh talk at U of C
>
>
>> did the new yorker in fact editorially support the war? i'm confused
>> by
>> this, as i've only seen negative pieces from the new yorker and a
>> friend insists that this is just untrue. the exchange below becomes
>> completely bizarre if the premise is false.
>>
>> j
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>