[lbo-talk] great communicator

Michael Catolico mcatolico at mindspring.com
Sat Jun 12 08:25:29 PDT 2004


while listening to the latest archive of doug's radio program (perlstein), i was struck by the impression that even those on the left now consider reagan to be a "great communicator". i remember how laughable this was during the reagan presidency when a group of friends and i collected some some video and radio recordings of presidents back to eisenhower and played representative samplings for an audience. even though all politicians "prevaricate" to some extent it was clear that reagan had the least ability to connect facts or even connect subject & predicate in his sentences of any of his immediate predecessors (even including nixon and the fluff of ford).

in fact, there was little that could be construed as "communication" in the speeches of reagan (if we assume that communication involves some linguistic or other transmittal of knowledge or feeling). what reagan did succeed at was, in a bumbling sort of way, telling people that it was all right to believe in what ever they already believed in - without actually telling them substantively what it is they or he believed. in this regard, the comparisons to reagan's political heir (bush jr.) are a bit beside the point. reagan - as the great communicator - found his rightful heir in clinton. after all clinton perfected the "communication by poll results" method that was nascent under reagan. in essence, clinton converted the reagan legacy into an exact science in which he basically told people what they wanted to hear based on surveys - then still did whatever he wanted.

michael catolico



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list