On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, Ted Winslow wrote:
> On the assumption of "a thorough going relativity of values and ideals"
> there can be no rational basis for preferring tolerance to sadistic
> domination.
>
But here's the trap: the dominator always justifies domination by pointing out his superior morals/values/norms. So in fact domination is in fact imbricated with the notion that values can be hierarchically arranged in a nonrelativistic way. Sadistic domination is not (typically) a product of the "thorough going relativity of values".
Miles