"C. G. Estabrook" wrote:
>
> So it's more important to believe in the absence of of moral hierarchies
> than to believe in some other things. And it's the right thing to do...
>
> Uh, isn't that a moral hierarchy? --CGE
No, it is a historical (and intellectual) judgment. It does not ascribe moral turpitude to those who reject it nor moral high ground to those who affirm it. It can be argued in ways in which the assertion of moral hierarchies (and in particular the application of any particular moral hierarchy) can't be.
Carrol