>Democrats in Arizona are challenging signatures Nader submitted to
>get on that state's ballot. Word from the field is that there are
>probably enough suspect signatures to keep Nader off the ballot.
>In addition to suspect signatures, entire reams of signatures can be
>invalidated if the person collecting them is a felon. Turns out that
>out of the 122 paid people who gathered the Nader signatures, at
>least 19 are confirmed felons. One of them was convicted for forgery.
We think ex-felons should be able to vote, no? So why should they be forbidden to collect signatures?
Doug