>Then, why do you say that Nader "seems seriously nuts, in both the
>political and psychopathological senses," on account of his having
>given up on the Democratic Party in 1979?
There was a series of stories in that piece, not just one. Talking in code and turning on his once and future associate Joan Claybrook are two other examples. As was his prediction about Reagan leading to mass mobilization - he's apparently of the worse the better school.
Doug