[lbo-talk] 9/11 Probe is the new terror

[John Thornton]

I have not read anything from "conspiracists" about the scrambled jets 
issue but I have always thought it odd that it only took about 20 minutes 
after suspicions were raised for fighter jets from Eglin (I think) to 
intercept Payne Stewarts flight. That was how long his mother said it took 
so I am not certain it's accurate. It was less than an hour anyway. Is 
there anything worth reading about this? This seems like such a strangely 
polarizing issue with some people seemingly desperate to latch onto any 
flimsy evidence and others trying hard to distance themselves from and 
discredit anything they feel isn't well enough researched so as to avoid 
the conspiracist label being applied to their work. Maybe it's a way to 
avoid the issue but I figure the truth of who knew what, if anything, will 
never be answered to everyones satisfaction so I don't spend too much time 
on it.

John Thornton

At 12:43 PM 3/7/2004, you Michael Pugliese wrote:
>     Just for starters on the scrambled jets issue...And, Ruppert has 
> cited approvingly the work of far rightist (so far right the Hoover Inst. 
> found him embarrassing an fired him) Anthony Sutton, "Trilaterials Over 
> Washington) and Chossudovsky has reprinted in his magazine and website, 
> pieces from LaRouche's EIR, as well as long ridiculous pieces on HAARP as 
> weather modification.
>
>http://lists.econ.utah.edu/pipermail/rad-green/2000-July/003833.html
>[R-G] Re: GUILTY FOR 9-11: BUSH, RUMSFELD, MYERS by Jared Israel and 
>Illarion Bykov
>Bob Enoch bobenoch at shaw.ca
>Tue Jul 4 23:24:13 MDT 2000