Let's say, for the sake of an argument, that the opinion of a person who philosophically discounts "a very Eden of the innate rights of man," where "alone rule Freedom, Equality, Property and Bentham" (at <http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/ch06.htm>), is a symptom of clinical depression, rather than a piece of political philosophy. In that case, it is a biologically determinist argument against thinking of an individual as an uncaused cause, which deflates "the Importance of Choice" in the subject line.
It is said that "[e]very year more than 19 million American Adults suffer from clinical depression" (at <http://www.nmha.org/ccd/index.cfm>) and that "[t]he National Comorbidity Study, a large survey of adults in the United States released last year, found that 1.7 women for every man had experienced at least one episode of depression" (at <http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/16/health/psychology/16DEPR.html>). Are those 19 million clinically depressed Americans historical materialists in the closet? Are women more likely to be in favor of Althusser's philosophy than men? :-> -- Yoshie
* Bring Them Home Now! <http://www.bringthemhomenow.org/> * Calendars of Events in Columbus: <http://sif.org.ohio-state.edu/calendar.html>, <http://www.freepress.org/calendar.php>, & <http://www.cpanews.org/> * Student International Forum: <http://sif.org.ohio-state.edu/> * Committee for Justice in Palestine: <http://www.osudivest.org/> * Al-Awda-Ohio: <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Al-Awda-Ohio> * Solidarity: <http://www.solidarity-us.org/>