[lbo-talk] Chomsky, Nader, & the Green Party

[Luke Weiger]

Well, Chomsky claims, "My feeling is pretty much the way it was in the year
2000. I admire Ralph Nader and Denis Kucinich very much, and insofar as they
bring up issues and carry out an educational and organisational function -
that's important, and fine, and I support it."  But I'm pretty sure that he
voted for Nader in '00 because Mass was a "safe" state, and I don't think he
ever unambiguously urged others in contested states to vote for Gore.

-- Luke

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "C. G. Estabrook" <galliher at alexia.lis.uiuc.edu>
To: <lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Chomsky, Nader, & the Green Party


> Actually, that was his position in 2000, as he says in the recent Guardian
> interview.  --CGE
>
>
> On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Luke Weiger wrote:
>
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "John Lacny" <jlacny at earthlink.net>
> > To: <lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org>
> > Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 6:01 PM
> > Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Chomsky, Nader, & the Green Party
> >
> >
> > > I don't get why people are so shocked that Chomsky has taken this
> > > position.
> > > This has always been his position, from election to election,
> >
> > Not in '00, right?
> >
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk