--- joanna bujes <jbujes at covad.net> wrote:
> What's wrong with a little cheap sensuality?
>
> Doug
>
> There's nothing wrong with a little cheap
> sensuality. Wittgenstein was a Daffy Duck fan and
> Krishnamurti loved the feel of a well-cut English
> suit. But when you turn on the T.V. you don't get a
> little cheap sensuality, you get wall-to-wall,
> infinite, unending cheap sensuality.
>
> Joanna
So don't turn it on.
A well-cut English suit isn't _cheap_ sensuality. And, although it's debated, I know, some say that W's taste in sensuality was a bit rougher than Daffy Duck. Not that there is anything wrong with either rough trade or Warner Bros cartoons.
jks
>
> ___________________________________
>
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html