>?(Even the heavens line up against the Bush Regime.)
>
>THE IDES OF JUNE
>
>by Henry Selzer
>
>This article explores the Saturn transit to the Sun in the United States
>chart coming up in June 2004 in the context of other outer planet transits
>to the U.S. chart. The symbolism reveals further problems for the Bush White
>House at this time. Like the prophetic "Ides of March" from Shakespeare's
>Julius Caesar, mid June spells trouble for this already besieged
>administration.
>
>[...]
>
>Read it here:
>http://www.astrograph.com/articles/IdesofJune.html
Hilarious. What would Adorno say? More:
>When we look ahead to the June 11th transit of Saturn to U.S. Sun,
>we find that Uranus stations retrograde the preceding day, June
>10th, in square to its natal position in the U.S. chart. U.S. Uranus
>is also being squared by transiting Jupiter, opposite transiting
>Uranus, and aspected by the Moon at this time. These are therefore
>significant timing factors in the transits to the U.S. chart for
>June 10th and 11th. Uranus represents surprising enlightenment, and
>we may expect unusual and startling events to transpire at this time
>that powerfully affect the national psyche. The underlying purpose
>of these events will be to shock the minds of Americans into a new
>and different perspective, another way of looking at the day, rather
>than business as usual.
>
>There are other significant timing transits in effect on June 11,
>2004. The Sun is exactly on U.S. Mars that day, while transiting
>Mars conjunct U.S. Mercury, and transiting Mercury is very close to
>the descendant of the U.S chart, as is transiting Venus. The
>Mercury/Venus midpoint is almost exactly on the U.S. Descendant (see
>chart).
>
>We can expect some startling developments at the time of the June 11
>Saturn transit, possibly involving the continuing deteriorating
>situation in Iraq, possibly involving the revelation of further
>scandal in the Bush White House. My own belief is that by the time
>of the Republican convention this one-term president will not even
>be able to run for office as his party's candidate.