[lbo-talk] Kerryismo - an end in itself

Joseph Wanzala jwanzala at hotmail.com
Mon May 10 13:02:47 PDT 2004


http://eatthestate.org/08-14/WhosLesserEvil.htm

Who's The Lesser Evil?

by Eddie Tews

Gabriel Kolko -- in this writer's estimation, our most indispensable historian -- argues in a recent piece on the Counterpunch website that because a second Bush term would possibly intensify the international enmity elicited by its bumbling unilateralism, it could be preferable to a Kerry Administration:

"Kerry is neither articulate nor impressive as a candidate or as someone who is likely to formulate an alternative to Bush's foreign and defense policies, which have much more in common with Clinton's than they have differences. To be critical of Bush is scarcely justification for wishful thinking about Kerry. Since 1947, the foreign policies of the Democrats and Republicans have been essentially consensual on crucial issues -- "bipartisan" as both parties phrase it -- but they often utilize quite different rhetoric.

"Critics of the existing foreign or domestic order will not take over Washington this November. As dangerous as it is, Bush's reelection may be a lesser evil because he is much more likely to continue the destruction of the alliance system that is so crucial to American power."

Kolko echoes thoughts that have been rattling through your narrator's head -- regarding the domestic political milieu -- since witnessing the apoplectic reaction to Ralph Nader's announcement of his candidacy.

It is becoming clear that all-too-many Kerry supporters view November's plebiscite as an end in itself. That, if Kerry should prevail, the reaction of a too-large proportion of his voters will be overwhelming relief -- "Whew! That was a close one!" -- followed by a repeat of Clinton-era apathy and apologetics.

Whereas, a Bush victory couldn't but propagate the amazingly diverse and widespread lobbying and protest movement which saw the New York Times declare public political involvement the World's "second superpower." From the unprecedented pre-war protest mobilisations, to the hundred-plus official municipal renunciations of the PATRIOT Act, to the overwhelming response to the FCC's proposed further relaxation of media ownership restrictions, to the virtual implosion of the WTO, to the solidarity actions of "internationals" in Iraq and Palestine; the accomplishments have been many, and the momentum is gathering.

So even though a Kerry administration would no doubt be marginally less nefarious in its designs, in the absence of activist mitigation of these designs, the net effect could well be more disastrous than a second Bush Administration.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list