Martin
On May 18, 2004, at 11:08 AM, frank scott wrote:
> but then it follows ( sagely scratching philosophic beard) that if we
> were powerful enough to create a social revolution, we wouldn't need
> one...huh?
>
> aren't a great number of reforms necessary in making social change of a
> serious nature? the above sounds a little self defeating...say it aint
> so, or clarify, please?