[lbo-talk] Pacifica 9-11 coverage

[Joseph Wanzala]

the probative value of evidence is not a necessarily a function of its sheer 
volume. Nonetheless, there is an abundance of information in the public 
record suggesting that the official story about 9-11 is a fabrication. It is 
also clear that the Bush administration is suppressing information that 
might help shed light on not only who the perpetrators actually were but how 
they were so successful. For example, former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds, 
who is under a gag order, has said:

"If they were to do real investigations we would see several significant 
high level criminal prosecutions in this country. And that is something that 
they are not going to let out. And, believe me; they will do everything to 
cover this up."

http://baltimorechronicle.com/050704SibelEdmonds.shtml


>From: Jon Johanning <jjohanning at igc.org>
>Reply-To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Pacifica 9-11 coverage
>Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 23:05:00 -0400
>
>On Thursday, May 20, 2004, at 02:44  PM, Joseph Wanzala wrote:
>
>>In other words, all you are saying is that some conspiracy theories are 
>>more equal than others.
>
>No, I think he may be saying that some have more evidence supporting them 
>than others.
>
>
>Jon Johanning // jjohanning at igc.org
>__________________________________
>A sympathetic Scot summed it all up very neatly in the remark, 'You should 
>make a point of trying every experience once, excepting incest and 
>folk-dancing.' -- Sir Arnold Bax
>
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk