[lbo-talk] Nader Does the CFR
C. G. Estabrook
galliher at alexia.lis.uiuc.edu
Sun May 30 19:51:01 PDT 2004
I think they've argued (and I would agree) that the demand should be
immediate US withdrawal -- corporate and military -- without waiting for
the US to arrange UN replacements or an international presence, because
it's clear whose interests would be served under those circumstances. If
the Iraqis want to arrange UN replacements or an international presence,
they would of course be free to do so. The only matters left for the US
would be trying the American war criminals (or, preferably, delivering
them to an international tribunal, like Milosevic) and paying reparations.
--CGE
On Sun, 30 May 2004, Doug Henwood wrote:
> At least two of our distinguished listmembers, Cdes Cox and Furuhashi,
> repeatedly have said no UN replacements, no international presence -
> leave it to the Iraqis.
More information about the lbo-talk
mailing list