CounterPunch, in fact, ran a comparison to the 1932 situation, which is apt, though their author missed the key point. FDR was forced by popular forces to improve the society, despite having run in 32 as a budget balancer. Kerry could be forced in the same direction by the people. He did once protest Vietnam and did open up the BCCI/Contragate thing. Again, I'm not at all optimistic, but I can honestly imagine a scenario in which it would happen.
And I say all this as a hardcore Nader-liker. I voted for him in 96 and 00. Ralph should have quit and endorsed Kerry two weeks ago.
-----Original Message----- From: lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org [mailto:lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org] On Behalf Of Shane Mage Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 11:45 AM To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Stupid Elections, Leftist Cowards
Ulhas asks:
>Are foreign policy questions the really decisive ones in the US
>politics?
"foreign policy" is never at issue in US duopolist politics. The issue in today's Stupid Election is The War. And what makes this election really, really stupid is that the vast majority of antiwar Americans, including, apparently, most of those posting on this list, have so succumbed to ABB Dementia that they are actually voting *for* the war by giving their vote to a pro-war candidate without even a trace of a "tactical voting" rationale.
Shane Mage
"Thunderbolt steers all things...It consents and does not consent to be called Zeus."
Herakleitos of Ephesos ___________________________________ http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk