Anonymous Bush aides are already being quoted saying that Kerry is "delusional" for not conceding Ohio.
---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: snit snat <snitilicious at tampabay.rr.com> Reply-To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 03:55:31 -0500
>At 01:50 AM 11/3/2004, joanna bujes wrote:
>>I don't actually believe that a big turnout is consistent with a Bush
>>victory. There was a big turnout, particularly of minority votesrs....and
>>a Bush victory.
>>
>>It's not that I overestimate the American electorate; it's just that it
>>doesn't add up.
>>
>>Somehow, I don't think this is going to hold up. It's not optimisim. I'm
>>the least optimistic person in the world....it just doesn't compute....on
>>any level. Sorry to be so vague.
>
>
>i don't frickin' believe it either. 1/3 of the population was voting early
>and it still looked like the turnout was up at the polls. Then I read that,
>wherever there is an audit trail, the exit polls match up, but wherever
>there isn't one, they don't?
>
>And, on the radio, people were reporting that they'd vote, check the screen
>and see that everything had been changed to the republicans. One woman
>tried three times and then complained. Sure enough, she was doing it right
>and something was fucking up by the time it got to the final page. The
>reporter--and they really stay away from conspiracy theory on this
>station--said that they figure there was a subtle mechanism to throw out
>votes every so often, drip-drip-drip, and maybe no one would notice.
>
>Is this true you think? will these people bitch? I pray to Ghu!
>
>http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=1290765&mesg_id=1290765
>
>
>kelley
>
>
>"We live under the Confederacy.
>We're a podunk bunch of swaggering
>pious hicks."
>
> --Bruce Sterling
>
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
________________________________________________________________