> "Gregory Geboski" <greg at mail.unionwebservices.com> wrote:
>Sorry for the bad citing. As I said, I hadn't saved the original
screen shot, so >maybe I was mixing it up with some other exit poll.
Although I certainly can't guess >which one, as it was Ohio I had been
tracking. It was one of those weird "What the >hell, I could have
sworn..." moments.
>
>I saw later that Yoshie had sent the URL for the poll
>
>http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/OH/P/00/index.html
>
>so chances are others here have seen it, too, and can debunk what
could be the >actions of my aging brain. Basically, I remember the pie
charts showing a solid >female vote going to Kerry (something in the
53-54% rang) with very weak male >support for Bush (that pie chart I
remember as even or almost even), with the >majority of all
respondents being women, giving what seemed like good news to >Kerry.
Almost a flip of the current pie charts (the two on the left).
>
>So if anyone has these data from earlier in the evening, debunk/confirm away.
>
>Not that it matters, I guess. Just heard that Kerry is conceding...
If he is in fact >overlooking improprieties "for the good of the
country" he should be beaten to >death with a stick, even if he's
obviously in a lot worse shape than Gore was in >2000...
>
>
>---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
>From: "Chris Doss" <cdoss at rambler.ru>
>Reply-To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 12:43:51 +0300
>
>I can't believe they could pull off or even implement anything so
>obvious.
>
>On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 01:36:03 -0800
> "Gregory Geboski" <greg at mail.unionwebservices.com> wrote:
>> I was following CNN on-line, and I noticed they had an exit poll
>>that clearly indicated Kerry would win. Close, but there was a solid
>>gender gap, solid black voting for Kerry, and weak white male voting
>>for Bush. I sent the URL around to some friends. Then, I went back to
>>check the thing, and I swear the results were changed. I wish I had
>>saved the first one I saw.
>>
>> Anonymous Bush aides are already being
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>