> -----Original Message-----
> From: lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org [mailto:lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org]
> On Behalf Of Nathan Newman
> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 11:56 AM
> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
> Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] End of Black Reconstruction (was Why I HateCourts-
> -orhow judicial review destroyed the country)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Dawson" <MDawson at pdx.edu>
> -Nathan also views Reconstruction too narrowly -- as being just a matter
> of
> -"turning slaves into voters." Of course, what Reconstruction was really
> -about was turning slaves into voters AND landowners. The latter half of
> -that formula never got off the ground. Grant's troops started giving
> -slavemasters "their" plantations back before the dust from the war had
> even
> -settled.
>
> Reconstruction was what it was-- which was a civil rights and voting
> rights
> victory. Many people wanted more in the economic sphere, but that's not
> what happened. And the question is why Reconstruction as it was, not what
> people wished it was, was destroyed by Klan violence in the South.
>
> And when the Supreme Court declared that the Klan and its sister
> organizations could not be prosecuted under federal law, it gave them full
> freedom to end Reconstruction. That was what caused the destruction of
> Reconstruction and led to another century of Jim Crow subjugation in the
> South.
>
>
> Nathan Newman
>
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk