> Jonathan Lassen wrote:
>
>> Also, this is only for the 18,000+ retail workers, not the 10 million
>> + workers in Wal-Mart's subcontracting factories. Still, a joyful
>> piece of news.
>
> Is the FT right?
>
>> Independent unions are banned in China, and the federation unions
>> have traditionally been an instrument for the communist party to
>> control workers, not a vehicle for agitation and strikes, which are
>> almost never allowed.
>
> If so, how joyful a piece of news is this?
Think of its usefulness in domestic union organizing drives. "Heck, in China Wal-Mart lets workers join unions--why can't you do that here in America? Isn't it a free country?"
John A