>> If 'communist party control' means that (very progressive) labor laws
>> are enforced, what's to be opposed?
>
> Does that mean there are few abuses of workers in China, because of the
> enforcement of those very progressive labor laws?
I was referring to the yet-to-be-established AFCTU-affiliated unions at Wal-Mart in China. China's labor laws are at least as ill-enforced as labor laws in the US. And the vast majority of workers in China, like those in the US, do not belong to unions.
...
> But would
> the recognition of a union at Wal-Mart China make any difference to the
> workers at all?
Probably, though its demonstration effect will probably make more difference.
JL