Liza
> From: joanna bujes <jbujes at covad.net>
> Reply-To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:41:58 -0800
> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
> Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Challenge for leftists of all stripes
>
> Problem is, they are committing these crimes in pursuit of their prime
> directive which is "maximize profits." This prime directive is
> equivalent to their "right to life." If they were computers, I guess you
> could get them to self destruct by pondering the paradox that they must
> destroy those they formally serve. But they're not computers. They're
> instruments of class domination, and this they do very well under the
> aegis of personhood.
>
> Joanna
>
> Liza Featherstone wrote:
>
>> One thing I always wonder about the corporate personhood, is, wouldn't it be
>> better to expand it in a totally literal-minded way. (I know, you would have
>> to abolish limited liability - I don't know how to do that, of course.) Say,
>> if they are going to be considered people and have the rights people have,
>> they should have the responsibilities people have. Thus, say, OK
>> corporations are people, so, when they commit crimes, the board, CEO and all
>> of upper management have to do jail time. They cause someone's death, they
>> get life sentences. Three strikes in California, we throw away the key. Etc.
>> You could then criminalize environmental and labor law violations, and all
>> sorts of other potentially great stuff. I think most people would rather see
>> corporations gain responsibilities -- and miscreants wear leg irons -- than
>> lose rights.
>>
>> Liza
>>
>>
>>
>>> From: "Nathan Newman" <nathanne at nathannewman.org>
>>> Reply-To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>>> Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:00:12 -0500
>>> To: <lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Challenge for leftists of all stripes
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Doug Henwood" <dhenwood at panix.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> John Thornton wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> All persons are guaranteed "free speech". Corporations can donate
>>>> money to political parties or individuals as a guaranteed form of
>>>> free speech.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> -I think this line of complaint is more petit bourgeois than
>>> -proletarian. It seems founded on an often undisclosed nostalgia for
>>> -the 19th century world of proprietorships or small partnerships. And
>>> -what a wonderful time that was!
>>>
>>> No, the complaints about legal personhood for corporations have to do with
>>> the history of courts in the US using that "personhood" to endow them with
>>> a range of constitutional rights that legislatures could not regulate. For
>>> decades, those rights included a range of economic contracting rights that
>>> stunted legislative regulation.
>>>
>>> More recently, "free speech" and other "associational" rights have been
>>> raised to try to block a range of regulations. Let me give one example.
>>> At one point, California required Pacific Gas & Electric to include a flyer
>>> by a consumer group, TURN, advertising to ratepayers their ability to join
>>> TURN and support a consumer advocate against higher electric rates. The
>>> US Supreme Court struck down this law as violating the free speech rights
>>> of PG&E against having to be associated with the views of TURN.
>>>
>>> Believe me, in the legal work I do on economic regulation, corporate
>>> opponents cite their constiutional rights against violations of equal
>>> protection, free speech, due process and a range of other rights to combat
>>> economic regulation. Corporate personhood is indeed one of the deadlier
>>> weapons against democracy in the United States. We had a period after the
>>> New Deal when this was largely abandoned, but it is creeping up on us
>>> day-to-day and is likely to accellerate in the coming years as more
>>> reactionary jurists extend their control of the courts.
>>>
>>> Nathan Newman
>>>
>>> ___________________________________
>>> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ___________________________________
>> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>>
>> .
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk