[lbo-talk] Altruism & Evolution?

Charles Brown cbrown at michiganlegal.org
Tue Nov 30 09:43:35 PST 2004


I gotta spank Luke on this one: this is naive sociobiology. Not even Darwin argues that all traits in a species are inevitably the result of natural selection! Check out Gould's spandrel analogy (discussed at some length in The Structure of Evolutionary Theory). It is absolutely incorrect to assume that all behaviors observed in humans today must have occasionally contributed to reproductive success at some point in human history. (To be a little snarky, only someone who doesn't understand Darwin's concept of evolution would make Luke's claim above.)

Miles

^^^^^

CB: OK. However, Gould is still talking about genetically based behaviors, but just saying that some genotypes arise not through natural selection. I believe you want to go further than what you say above and say that much (most) human behavior is culturally based and not biologically based at all, don't you ?

Radical anti-essentialism is the idea that _no_ human behavior is biologically/genetically based. It is based on the kernel truth that "most" human behavior is not biologically, but culturally, based.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list