[lbo-talk] Challenge for leftists of all stripes

Nathan Newman nathanne at nathannewman.org
Tue Nov 30 17:10:47 PST 2004


----- Original Message ----- From: "Jon Johanning" <zenner41 at mac.com>

On Nov 30, 2004, at 2:20 PM, Nathan Newman wrote:
> But the free speech claims on behalf of corporations has become
> especially
> pernicious and in an information age, a lot of their activity has free
> speech implications, so it can allow them to escape a lot of government
> regulation potentially.

-Has there been any attempt to narrow the range of corporations' free -speech claims by arguing that they are much more powerful and richer, -and thus can buy more "speech," than actual persons, for which the -First Amendment was presumably written? Or is that too legally naive an -approach?

The issue is less the corporations asserting a right to speak in some forum -- although the advertising cases have massively cut the ability of government to regulate corporate advertising -- but on the corporate right NOT to speak or be forced to associate with speech they don't want to be associated with. It allows companies to avoid public responsibilities where they might be forced to "speak" to the public in ways they don't agree with.

Nathan Newman



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list